← All results

HOME IMPROVEMENTS · LEAD GENERATION · SOUTH OF ENGLAND
SERVICES WE RUN
PPC
CRO
MARKETING SOLUTIONS
Lead Generation
D2C Marketing
Performance Marketing
Profitability Growth
◆ AT A GLANCE ◆
To a profitable channel they own
Built from zero, against national brands with years in the same auctions.
Close rate on appointments sat
Of every appointment the team attended, nearly two in three closed.
Closed deal value from non-brand activity
The advertising is creating demand, not harvesting it.
Cost per lead, month three vs month one
Same channel, same market, three months of compounding.
At the client’s request, every figure on this page is a share, a rate or a relative movement. We have not published ad spend, lead volumes, cost per lead, deal values or return on spend in absolute terms, and no two figures here can be combined to derive any of them. If you want the absolute numbers, the client is happy for us to walk through them on a call under NDA.
◆ THE STARTING POINT ◆
WHAT WE INHERITED
No Google Ads account, no conversion tracking and no landing pages of their own
A category where three national brands hold the majority of available search impressions
A sales process where most enquiries arrive by phone, so form tracking alone would have measured almost nothing
A lead definition inherited from pay-per-lead suppliers, where any contact counts as a lead regardless of whether it is a sales enquiry at all

◆ THE DIAGNOSIS ◆
Roughly seven in ten of the contacts coming through any channel in this category are service calls, wrong-company calls, duplicates or rows with no usable contact details. Those are stripped out before anything is claimed, so the number reported is genuine enquiries rather than raw volume. Judge a pay-per-lead supplier on the same basis and the comparison changes completely.
Strategic planning of what was actually being offered on each product line came first: the proposition, how it was priced against the national brands, and what would make someone choose a regional installer. Paid search cannot sell an offer that does not stand up next to the competition.
Landing pages were built per product line and improved continuously rather than once, with the objection that stops a homeowner answered on the page. In a category where a click costs what it costs here, conversion rate on the page is the single biggest lever on cost per deal.
Every lead is tracked through to genuine enquiry, to appointment sat, to closed deal and to its value, with phone orders verified keyword by keyword against the call details. It is the only way to know whether a channel beat a pay-per-lead supplier, and it is what proved that roughly nine in ten of closed value came from non-brand activity.
◆ THE WORK ◆
PHASE 01
Weeks 1–2
Before any spend, strategic planning of what was being offered on each product line and how it would be positioned against the national brands already dominating the auctions. The ads were written to that proposition rather than the proposition being retrofitted to the ads.
CRO
PHASE 02
Weeks 2–4
Campaigns, conversion tracking and call tracking built from nothing. Search took the high-intent demand, Performance Max extended reach, and roughly nineteen in twenty of media spend went to Google Ads with a small Meta retargeting layer behind it to catch the people who had already visited.
PPC
PHASE 03
Ongoing
Pages built per product line rather than shared, then changed continuously through the period on what the data showed. Conversion work was treated as a standing job, not a project with an end date — which is why cost per lead fell by more than forty per cent between the first month and the third.
CRO
PPC
PHASE 04
Ongoing
Leads followed through four stages: contact, genuine sales enquiry, appointment sat, closed order with a value. Phone orders verified against the call details report, keyword by keyword. The reporting the client gets is a lead-to-deal report, not a conversions dashboard.
PPC
PHASE 05
Month 3
By the end of the first quarter the account was appearing in the single top advertising position roughly twice as often as two of the national brands in the same auctions, on a fraction of their impression share. Position, not budget, is how a regional installer wins against a national one.
PPC

◆ HOW IT IS RUN ◆
One principal operator
The person who built the account is the person who runs it and the person on the call. No account manager relaying instructions, and no junior learning on the budget.
Every call reviewed, not sampled
Calls are listened to and classified rather than counted. A thirty-three second call that Google’s own reporting discounted turned into one of the largest orders of the period — automated conversion counting would have thrown it away.
Weekly, not monthly
Search terms, landing page performance and lead quality reviewed every week. On a new account in a competitive auction, a month of drift is a month of budget.
Judged on closed deals
The report the client is given runs from contact to closed order value. A cost per lead that looks good and produces nothing is a worse outcome than a higher one that fills the diary.
Reallocation is built in
Effort moves to whichever part is the constraint. Across this build that meant the offer first, then the landing pages, then the bidding.
Everything is theirs
Account, tracking, landing pages and data sit in the client’s name and have from day one, on thirty days’ notice. That is the entire point of building it rather than buying leads.
◆ WHAT MOVED ◆
Principal operator, TGMA
◆ WHAT IS NEXT ◆
Recovering the cancelled and unattended appointments, which are genuine enquiries already paid for and the cheapest revenue available to the account
Taking impression share up from roughly one in nine, where the national brands still hold the majority of the auctions
Extending the same build into the remaining product lines on the back of the proposition work already done
Keeping brand and non-brand activity in one account, because separating them would cut more than a third of the conversion evidence the bidding runs on